The Decentralization LARP: Why Your Favorite 'Federated' App is Just Web2 in a Fake Mustache

Permalink

Follow me via:

---

Text-to-speech support required

The Word “Decentralization” Has Been Stolen

It wasn’t an accident. It was a strategic kidnapping by companies that want the aesthetic of a revolution without actually giving up the keys to the kingdom.

“Decentralization” is the new “Organic”—slap it on the label, charge a premium in VC funding, and hope nobody notices the factory in the back. Real decentralization means no one is in charge. Appropriated “decentralization” means a corporation is technically not in charge of your data storage, but they still own the air you breathe.

The Bluesky Problem: Distributed Hosting, Centralized Vibes

Bluesky loves to market itself as the “federated” savior of social media. But if you dig into the AT Protocol, you realize it’s basically a gated community where they let you build your own house, but they still own the only road in and out.

In their own Federation Architecture, they describe a “Big World” design. Sure, you can run your own Personal Data Server (PDS)—which is very “distributed” of you—but to actually see anyone else, you have to funnel through Relays and AppViews that Bluesky PBC largely controls. I would know; I run my own PDS right behind my GoToSocial instance, and the structural difference is night and day.

• The Relay: This is a “super-powered” node that creates a “Firehose” of data. While anyone could host one, it is comically resource-heavy.
• The AppView: This is the magic box that assembles your feed. In Bluesky, you are downstream from a central indexer.

If Bluesky the company turned off their servers tomorrow, the “Firehose” would dry up. You’d be left sitting on your PDS, shouting into a void that no one is indexing. That’s not a federation; that’s a centralized service with a very expensive, distributed filing cabinet.

The Crypto Appropriation: Capitalism with Extra Steps

Crypto took “decentralization” and used it to sell pictures of bored apes. It’s the ultimate “trust me, bro” of tech.

I’m well aware of the irony here. I had my own hand-drawn NFT project back in 2020 that, admittedly, afforded me things I had gone without for over half a decade and even got me fifteen minutes of fame with the official pre-Musk Twitter account. But let’s call a spade a spade: every DAO that votes by token weight is just shareholder capitalism with a worse UI and more rug pulls.

We’re told the blockchain is decentralized, yet most apps rely on Infura—a central API—to even function. If Infura sneezes, half of “Web3” catches a cold and dies. It’s decentralization theater where the actors are paid in “Stablecoins” that are about as stable as a Jenga tower in an earthquake.

I’ve seen this firsthand. NFT projects juggle various coins (Ethereum, Polygon, Solana), and I even own a “funny-money” coin on pump.fun—a platform where people mostly launch a coin, then immediately rugpull to an audience of gamblers who never seem to learn their lesson.

What Actual Decentralization Looks Like (And Why It Sucks)

Let’s be real: True decentralization is often a janky mess. It doesn’t have a billion-dollar marketing budget or a slick interface designed by former Twitter execs.

• Email: It’s ancient, filled with spam, and everyone uses Gmail. But—and this is the big one—if Google disappears, the protocol doesn’t. A self-hosted mail server will keep receiving 50% off pizza coupons until the heat death of the universe.
• ActivityPub (The Fediverse): This is peer-to-peer federation. There is no “Firehose” controlled by one guy in a hoodie. If the Mastodon gGmbH founders decide to go live in the woods, the network won’t even notice.
• Administrative Feudalism: We have to address the elephant in the room. The Fediverse is basically a collection of digital fiefdoms. Your instance admin is the local Lord. They can read your DMs, ban you because they didn’t like your take on Star Wars, or defederate from half the internet because of a personal grudge.

The difference? In the Fediverse, you can move to a new kingdom free of charge and take most of your data with you (sorry about your posts, though). In Bluesky, there is only one kingdom, and the king is just pretending he’s a constitutional monarch.

The “If It Dies, You Die” Test

Ask yourself: “If the founding company disappeared tomorrow, would this still work?”

• Bluesky: Dead. The firehose is cut.
• Web3/Ethereum: Probably dead for anyone who isn’t a terminal-using wizard.
• Mastodon/ActivityPub: Alive. The servers keep talking to each other.
• RSS/Email: Alive. Immortal. The cockroaches of the internet.

Why This Matters

When Bluesky calls itself decentralized, it poisons the well. It makes people think “federation” is just a buzzword for “Twitter, but with a blue butterfly.” It captures users who want a real alternative and delivers them right back to a system that is structurally identical to the one they fled.

Real decentralization is messier, slower, and doesn’t have a “Discover” feed powered by a corporate algorithm. It’s running GoToSocial on a Raspberry Pi and actually owning your digital footprint, or running an Akkoma instance on a spider-web of servers across five different hosts.

Don’t buy the theater. If it feels too polished to be decentralized, it probably isn’t.