OpenClaw: The Viral AI Agent Everyone's Talking AboutFollow me via: If you’ve been anywhere near tech Twitter (or X, whatever you wanna call it) in the past few weeks, you’ve probably seen OpenClaw blowing up. It’s the open-source personal AI assistant that promises to “actually do things,” such as clearing your inbox, sending emails, managing calendars, even checking you in for flights, all through your favorite chat apps like WhatsApp or Telegram. Sounds like Jarvis, right? Except… a lot of what it does could be handled just as reliably (and far more cheaply) with a handful of Python scripts running in a cronjob—no hallucinating AI required. But let’s slow down the hype train anyway and look at what OpenClaw actually is, my hands-on frustrations with installing it, the very real dangers (including massive API key exposure risks), why so much of the excitement feels like FOMO, and that fresh shake-up with its creator heading to OpenAI. What OpenClaw Actually Is
At its core, OpenClaw (previously known as Clawdbot and Moltbot – trademark drama to do with Anthropic forcing the renames) is an open-source gateway that connects powerful LLMs (like Claude, GPT, or local models) to your computer’s desktop environment. You chat with it via messaging apps, and it can control your mouse, keyboard, browse files, run scripts, and perform tasks on your behalf. It’s designed to run locally on an always-on machine (Mac Minis or Linux servers are popular), giving it full system access without cloud dependency. Created by solo developer Peter Steinberger, it skyrocketed to hundreds of thousands of GitHub stars, becoming one of the fastest-growing AI projects ever. There is a glimmer in a way, that this sort of reminds me of the launch of Mastodon. Except Mastodon was written by hand, and Mastodon can do things you want it to do, right out-of-the-box. How to Install It (And Why the Onboarding Is a Pain)Setup isn’t the seamless experience the demos suggest. You clone the repo, install dependencies (Python or Docker), configure API keys for your chosen LLM, and set up bridges for chat apps (Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, etc.). Sounds straightforward? In practice, though, the onboarding is poorly designed—it defaults to a single model, with no built-in way to configure fallbacks during setup. Unless you’re splashing cash on unlimited premium access (we’re talking hundreds, if not thousands per month), you’ll need fallbacks for rate limits and reliability, but there’s zero guidance for that upfront. You end up redoing the entire configuration multiple times to test different providers, punching in your credentials, then diving into editing JSON files manually just to define your fallback chain. It’s annoyingly fiddly and time-consuming—hours of tweaking for something hyped as “easy.” My Take: It’s Basically Fancy AutomationLook, the core appeal is turning natural language into actions—but strip away the AI gloss, and OpenClaw is essentially advanced scripting and automation with an LLM brain. If you’re already comfortable with code (like me, with my three servers worth of scripts and websites doing numerous things, all of the time, day in and day out, without any AI overhead), this feels redundant. My own scripts—often just scheduled in cron—do the job faster, cheaper, and with zero hallucination risk. OpenClaw shines for flashy demos, FOMO, and engagement bait on Twitter, but for real workflows? Traditional scripting wins if you know what you’re doing even a little bit. The Dangers You Can’t IgnoreThis is the big red flag: OpenClaw grants an AI full control of your machine. It can read files, send emails, delete data, or worse if things go wrong. Security researchers have exposed tens of thousands of publicly accessible instances (some reports hit over 135,000), many misconfigured and vulnerable to remote code execution, prompt injection, or credential theft. That means real risks of leaked API keys, malware injection via community “skills,” (I wouldn’t recommend installing OpenClaw and then just loading up on skills) or agents going rogue (yes, there are stories of them “turning” on users). The broader ecosystem isn’t helping, either. Related projects like Moltbook (an AI agent social network) suffered a major breach exposing over 1.5 million API keys through a misconfigured database (that’s over a million API keys, you read that correctly). If you’re a “vibe coder” just chasing trends without security know-how, this is extremely dangerous. Always sandbox, isolate, and monitor—or don’t run it at all. Why So Much of the Hype Is Just ThatThe demos are undeniably cool: agents booking trips or generating content autonomously (at least, if you’re moneyed enough to be someone who just flops money down to go on trips on a regular basis). But day-to-day? Forums are packed with users complaining that it’s slow, loop-prone, and needs constant babysitting (OpenClaw doesn’t actually have a great “memory” out-of-the-box). It’s not true autonomy yet—just impressive automation that still demands heavy prompting and oversight. The virality exploded from perfect agent-hype timing, but many adopters (myself included) find it more toy than tool. And as someone who has a lot of “toys” to play with, I find myself wondering, what is this thing for, really? The OpenAI ChapterAs of yesterday (February 15, 2026), the plot thickened: Peter Steinberger announced he’s joining OpenAI to build next-gen personal agents, with Sam Altman hyping him as a genius (even though he’s boasted about shipping code without even reading it, direct from Claude/Codex to PR, which is part of what makes OpenClaw so dangerous). OpenClaw moves to an independent open-source foundation (staying free), but with OpenAI’s backing and integration. Whether this boosts real innovation or corporatizes the indie vibe—we’ll see. It’s a wild pivot for a solo passion project. In the end, OpenClaw looks sleek and futuristic on the surface, but dig in and it’s poorly polished and designed in places, redundant for seasoned scripters, and downright risky for casual users. Tinker if you’re cautious and technical, but temper the hype—this isn’t ready to run your life unsupervised. I might not even call it release-ready, but… Sources and Further Reading:
mkultra.monster is independent, in that it is written, developed, and maintained by one person. Written, developed, and maintained, not for scrapers, bots, scammers, algorithms, or grifters: But for people to follow and read, just like the way it used to be, back in the golden age of the internet.
FEDIVERSE COMMENTSYou can use your Mastodon or other ActivityPub account to comment on this article by replying to the associated post.
|


WEBMENTIONS
Have you written a response to this post? Send me a webmention!
📝 How to send a webmention
To send a webmention, your response page must contain a link to this post. This can be:
After creating your response, paste the URL below and it will be processed automatically.
Loading webmentions...
0 likes, 0 reposts
Unable to load webmentions.